Copyright © 2025 Michael Herman (Bindloss, Alberta, Canada) – Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International Public License
Web 7.0
, TDW, and TDW AgenticOS are trademarks of the Web 7.0 Foundation. All Rights Reserved.
Introduction
Below is a clean correlation analysis between the 7 Rights in the Manifesto of the Digital Age and the original 7 Principles for managing identic AI you provided earlier. I’ll be explicit about strength of alignment, direction of influence, and gaps.
Big Picture First (One-Sentence Framing)
- The 7 Principles are design and governance constraints on AI systems.
- The 7 Rights are human and societal outcomes those systems must serve.
In short:
Principles are the “how”; Rights are the “why.”
Correlation Matrix (Rights → Principles)
Legend
- ●●● = strong, direct correlation
- ●● = moderate correlation
- ● = indirect or enabling correlation
Manifesto Rights ↓ / AI Principles →ReliabilityTransparencyHuman AgencyAdaptabilityFairnessAccountabilitySafety1. Security of personhood●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●2. Education●●●●●●●●●●●●●3. Health & well-being●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●4. Economic security & work●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●5. Climate stability●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●6. Peace & security●●●●●●●●●●●●●7. Institutional accountability●●●●●●●●●●●●
Narrative Mapping (Right-by-Right)
1. Security of Personhood
Strongest alignment overall
- Human Agency → personal sovereignty, autonomy, consent
- Transparency → knowing how identity/data are used
- Fairness → protection from discriminatory profiling
- Accountability → redress for misuse or surveillance
- Safety → protection from manipulation and coercion
Interpretation:
This right is essentially the human-centered synthesis of five of your principles. It operationalizes them at the level of individual dignity.
2. Education
Primarily about adaptability and agency
- Human Agency → empowerment through learning
- Adaptability → lifelong learning in AI-shaped labor markets
- Fairness → equitable access to infrastructure and tools
Interpretation:
Education is the human adaptation layer required for your principles not to become elitist or exclusionary.
3. Health and Well-being
Reliability + Safety dominate
- Reliability → clinical accuracy and robustness
- Safety → “do no harm” in physical and mental health
- Accountability → liability for harm or negligence
Interpretation:
Healthcare is where your principles become non-negotiable, because failure has immediate human cost.
4. Economic Security & Meaningful Work
Human agency + fairness + adaptability
- Human Agency → meaningful work vs. automation domination
- Fairness → equitable distribution of AI-generated value
- Adaptability → redefining work and income models
Interpretation:
This right extends your principles into political economy. The principles constrain AI behavior; this right constrains AI-driven capitalism.
5. Climate Stability
Safety + accountability at planetary scale
- Safety → ecological harm prevention
- Accountability → responsibility for environmental impact
- Adaptability → climate-responsive systems
Interpretation:
This right introduces non-human stakeholders (future generations, ecosystems), which your principles imply but do not explicitly name.
6. Peace and Security
Safety and accountability dominate
- Safety → prohibition of autonomous violence
- Accountability → attribution of harm in warfare
- Fairness → prevention of asymmetric technological domination
Interpretation:
This is the hard boundary case: where your principles become geopolitical norms, not just business ethics.
7. Institutional Accountability
Near-perfect overlap
- Transparency → auditable governance
- Accountability → enforceability, redress, legitimacy
Interpretation:
This right is almost a direct restatement of your Accountability + Transparency principles, elevated to constitutional scale.
What the Rights Add That the Principles Do Not
The Manifesto extends the principles in three critical ways:
1. Explicit Human Entitlements
- Principles say what systems must do
- Rights say what people can demand
2. Macroeconomic Redistribution
- Universal Fabulous Income
- Data ownership and monetization
These are policy commitments, not system properties.
3. Intergenerational & Planetary Scope
- Climate
- Peace
- Future generations
Your principles imply responsibility, but the rights name the beneficiaries.
Bottom Line
-
High correlation: Every right maps to multiple principles.
-
No contradictions: The two frameworks are coherent.
-
Complementary roles:
- Principles = engineering + governance constraints
- Rights = societal goals + moral claims